Over the past two decades, the hedge fund industry has grown substantially. Hedge Fund
Research (HFR) reported on January 20, 2010 that there were about 530 hedge funds in the
industry in 1990 with roughly $50 bn of assets under management. By 2009, that number rose
to approximately 8,000 hedge funds with about $1.6 tn of assets under management. This
impressive growth of the hedge fund industry has attracted the attention of investors,
practitioners and academicians alike. It has been documented by Liang (1999), Agarwal and
Naik (2000), Edwards and Caglayan (2000), Cerrato and Iannelli (2006) that hedge funds
tend to outperform the conventional market indexes such as the S&P 500 during bearish
markets, while the traditional indexes tend to outperform hedge funds during bullish markets.
This feature, among others, like low risk and low correlation with traditional asset returns
make hedge funds attractive hedging instruments.
Given their importance in financial markets, a number of studies have examined the
ability of hedge funds to act as diversification tools. For instance, Gregoriou et al. (2001)
examined the random walk behavior of 10 hedge fund classes, including event-driven, global
international, global established, global emerging, global macro, market neutral, fund of
hedge funds, short sellers, long only, and sector, for the time period January 1991 through
December 2000. They applied the standard ADF unit root testing procedure and found that
the median returns of all the hedge fund classes with the exception of the market neutral are
random walk processes. They therefore concluded that investors should be able to reduce risk
by including hedge funds in their portfolios within the market neutral class.
|